Skip to Content
MilliporeSigma
  • Coexpression of HMGA2 and Oct4 predicts an unfavorable prognosis in human gastric cancer.

Coexpression of HMGA2 and Oct4 predicts an unfavorable prognosis in human gastric cancer.

Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) (2014-07-20)
Dequan Kong, Guoqiang Su, Lang Zha, Hongyu Zhang, Jifeng Xiang, Wei Xu, Yucheng Tang, Ziwei Wang
ABSTRACT

High mobility group protein A2 (HMGA2) and octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (Oct4) are transcription factors that play major roles in the acquisition of cancer stemness phenotypes and tumorigenicity of malignant neoplasms. The aim of this study was to analyze the association between HMGA2 and Oct4 expression and various clinicopathologic features in gastric cancer patients including invasion, metastasis, and clinical prognosis, in addition to overall survival. Immunohistochemistry was performed to explore the expression of HMGA2 and Oct4 in 158 gastric cancer and surrounding non-tumor tissues. Moreover, HMGA2 and Oct4 mRNA and protein levels were also detected by qRT-PCR and Western blotting, respectively, in 86 clinical tissue specimens and various gastric epithelial cell lines (GES-1, SGC7901, MKN45, and MKN27). Finally, associations between HMGA2 and Oct4 expression and clinicopathological features were analyzed by Pearson correlation coefficient. Survival analysis was performed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Taken together, we found that HMGA2 and Oct4 expression was significantly higher in gastric cancer tissues compared with non-cancerous tissues (P < 0.01), and HMGA2 and Oct4 protein levels were significantly higher in poorly differentiated gastric cancer cell lines (MKN45), moderately differentiated cell lines (SGC7901), and well-differentiated cell lines (MKN28) compared with human immortalized gastric epithelial cell lines (GES-1) (P < 0.01). Elevated HMGA2 and Oct4 levels were significantly associated with poor clinical prognosis (P < 0.05). Further conclusion showed that coexpression of HMGA2 and Oct4 in gastric cancer correlated with tumor invasion, metastasis, and clinical prognosis and predicted an unfavorable clinical outcome. These transcription factors may represent useful biomarkers to identify patients at high risk of postoperative recurrence.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrogen peroxide solution, 30 % (w/w) in H2O, contains stabilizer
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrogen peroxide solution, tested according to Ph. Eur.
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrogen peroxide solution, 34.5-36.5%
Supelco
Hydrogen peroxide solution, ≥30%, for trace analysis
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrogen peroxide solution, contains potassium stannate as inhibitor, 30-32 wt. % in water, semiconductor grade, 99.999% trace metals basis
Millipore
Hydrogen peroxide solution, 3%, suitable for microbiology
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrogen peroxide solution, SAJ first grade, ≥30.0%
Supelco
Hydrogen peroxide solution, 30 % (w/w), for ultratrace analysis
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrogen peroxide solution, purum p.a., ≥35% (RT)
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrogen peroxide solution, 50 wt. % in H2O, stabilized
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrogen Peroxide Solution, 30% (w/w), puriss. p.a., reag. ISO, reag. Ph. Eur.
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrogen peroxide solution, contains inhibitor, 30 wt. % in H2O, ACS reagent
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrogen peroxide solution, contains ~200 ppm acetanilide as stabilizer, 3 wt. % in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrogen peroxide solution, contains inhibitor, 35 wt. % in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrogen peroxide solution, contains inhibitor, 30 wt. % in H2O, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
Anti-HMGA2 antibody produced in rabbit