Skip to Content
Merck
  • Evaluation of a published in silico model and construction of a novel Bayesian model for predicting phospholipidosis inducing potential.

Evaluation of a published in silico model and construction of a novel Bayesian model for predicting phospholipidosis inducing potential.

Journal of chemical information and modeling (2007-04-13)
Dennis J Pelletier, Daniel Gehlhaar, Anne Tilloy-Ellul, Theodore O Johnson, Nigel Greene
ABSTRACT

The identification of phospholipidosis (PPL) during preclinical testing in animals is a recognized problem in the pharmaceutical industry. Depending on the intended indication and dosing regimen, PPL can delay or stop development of a compound in the drug discovery process. Therefore, for programs and projects where a PPL finding would have adverse impact on the success of the project, it would be desirable to be able to rapidly identify and screen out those compounds with the potential to induce PPL as early as possible. Currently, electron microscopy is the gold standard method for identifying phospholipidosis, but it is low-throughput and resource-demanding. Therefore, a low-cost, high-throughput screening strategy is required to overcome these limitations and be applicable in the drug discovery cycle. A recent publication by Ploemen et al. (Exp. Toxicol. Pathol. 2004, 55, 347-55) describes a method using the computed physicochemical properties pKa and ClogP as part of a simple calculation to determine a compound's potential to induce PPL. We have evaluated this method using a set of 201 compounds, both public and proprietary, with known in vivo PPL-inducing ability and have found the overall concordance to be 75%. We have proposed simple modifications to the model rules, which improve the model's concordance to 80%. Finally, we describe the development of a Bayesian model using the same compound set and found its overall concordance to be 83%.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrazine solution, 35 wt. % in H2O
Supelco
3-Methylcholanthrene, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Temozolomide, ≥98% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Caffeine, anhydrous, 99%, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
3-Methylcholanthrene, 98%
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrazine solution, 1.0 M in THF
Sigma-Aldrich
Colchicine, ≥95% (HPLC), powder
Supelco
Temozolomide, VETRANAL®, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Ketoconazole, 99.0-101.0% (EP, titration)
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetaminophen, meets USP testing specifications, 98.0-102.0%, powder
Sigma-Aldrich
Aspirin, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetaminophen, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Tamoxifen, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Piroxicam, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
L-Ethionine, ≥99% (TLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Caffeine, meets USP testing specifications, anhydrous
Sigma-Aldrich
Caffeine, powder, ReagentPlus®
Sigma-Aldrich
Valproic acid sodium salt, 98%
Sigma-Aldrich
Caffeine, Sigma Reference Standard, vial of 250 mg
Sigma-Aldrich
Caffeine, BioXtra
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydroxyurea, 98%, powder
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetaminophen, BioXtra, ≥99.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Colchicine, BioReagent, suitable for plant cell culture, ≥95% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Clofibrate, liquid
Sigma-Aldrich
Caffeine, anhydrous, tested according to Ph. Eur.
Supelco
Mettler-Toledo Calibration substance ME 18872, Caffeine, traceable to primary standards (LGC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Famotidine
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrazine solution, 1.0 M in ethanol
Supelco
Chloroform solution, NMR reference standard, 1% in acetone-d6 (99.9 atom % D)
Supelco
Chloroform solution, certified reference material, 5000 μg/mL in methanol