Skip to Content
Merck
  • A predictive ligand-based Bayesian model for human drug-induced liver injury.

A predictive ligand-based Bayesian model for human drug-induced liver injury.

Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals (2010-09-17)
Sean Ekins, Antony J Williams, Jinghai J Xu
ABSTRACT

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is one of the most important reasons for drug development failure at both preapproval and postapproval stages. There has been increased interest in developing predictive in vivo, in vitro, and in silico models to identify compounds that cause idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity. In the current study, we applied machine learning, a Bayesian modeling method with extended connectivity fingerprints and other interpretable descriptors. The model that was developed and internally validated (using a training set of 295 compounds) was then applied to a large test set relative to the training set (237 compounds) for external validation. The resulting concordance of 60%, sensitivity of 56%, and specificity of 67% were comparable to results for internal validation. The Bayesian model with extended connectivity functional class fingerprints of maximum diameter 6 (ECFC_6) and interpretable descriptors suggested several substructures that are chemically reactive and may also be important for DILI-causing compounds, e.g., ketones, diols, and α-methyl styrene type structures. Using Smiles Arbitrary Target Specification (SMARTS) filters published by several pharmaceutical companies, we evaluated whether such reactive substructures could be readily detected by any of the published filters. It was apparent that the most stringent filters used in this study, such as the Abbott alerts, which captures thiol traps and other compounds, may be of use in identifying DILI-causing compounds (sensitivity 67%). A significant outcome of the present study is that we provide predictions for many compounds that cause DILI by using the knowledge we have available from previous studies. These computational models may represent cost-effective selection criteria before in vitro or in vivo experimental studies.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
13-cis-Retinoic acid, ≥98% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Amoxicillin, 95.0-102.0% anhydrous basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Folic acid, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
Folic acid, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture, suitable for insect cell culture, suitable for plant cell culture, ≥97%
Sigma-Aldrich
Folic acid, ≥97%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetylcholine chloride, suitable for cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
Menadione, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
Ergocalciferol, 40,000,000 USP units/g
Sigma-Aldrich
L-Arginine, from non-animal source, meets EP, USP testing specifications, suitable for cell culture, 98.5-101.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
(+)-Pseudoephedrine hydrochloride, ≥98%
Sigma-Aldrich
Caffeine, powder, ReagentPlus®
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetylcholine chloride, ≥99% (TLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Rotenone, ≥95%
Sigma-Aldrich
Isoprenaline hydrochloride
Sigma-Aldrich
Nalidixic acid, ≥98%
Sigma-Aldrich
L-Arginine, reagent grade, ≥98%
Sigma-Aldrich
Caffeine, BioXtra
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrochlorothiazide, crystalline
Sigma-Aldrich
Betamethasone, ≥98%
Sigma-Aldrich
Estradiol, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
Caffeine, Sigma Reference Standard, vial of 250 mg
Sigma-Aldrich
Valproic acid sodium salt, 98%
Sigma-Aldrich
Caffeine, meets USP testing specifications, anhydrous
Sigma-Aldrich
Furosemide
Sigma-Aldrich
Ampicillin sodium salt, powder or crystals, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
N-Acetyl-L-cysteine, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetaminophen, BioXtra, ≥99.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Gabapentin, solid
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydroxyurea, 98%, powder
Sigma-Aldrich
Ampicillin sodium salt