Skip to Content
Merck
  • The metabolic costs of improving ethanol yield by reducing glycerol formation capacity under anaerobic conditions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

The metabolic costs of improving ethanol yield by reducing glycerol formation capacity under anaerobic conditions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Microbial cell factories (2013-03-30)
Julien Pagliardini, Georg Hubmann, Sandrine Alfenore, Elke Nevoigt, Carine Bideaux, Stephane E Guillouet
ABSTRACT

Finely regulating the carbon flux through the glycerol pathway by regulating the expression of the rate controlling enzyme, glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GPDH), has been a promising approach to redirect carbon from glycerol to ethanol and thereby increasing the ethanol yield in ethanol production. Here, strains engineered in the promoter of GPD1 and deleted in GPD2 were used to investigate the possibility of reducing glycerol production of Saccharomyces cerevisiae without jeopardising its ability to cope with process stress during ethanol production. For this purpose, the mutant strains TEFmut7 and TEFmut2 with different GPD1 residual expression were studied in Very High Ethanol Performance (VHEP) fed-batch process under anaerobic conditions. Both strains showed a drastic reduction of the glycerol yield by 44 and 61% while the ethanol yield improved by 2 and 7% respectively. TEFmut2 strain showing the highest ethanol yield was accompanied by a 28% reduction of the biomass yield. The modulation of the glycerol formation led to profound redox and energetic changes resulting in a reduction of the ATP yield (YATP) and a modulation of the production of organic acids (acetate, pyruvate and succinate). Those metabolic rearrangements resulted in a loss of ethanol and stress tolerance of the mutants, contrarily to what was previously observed under aerobiosis. This work demonstrates the potential of fine-tuned pathway engineering, particularly when a compromise has to be found between high product yield on one hand and acceptable growth, productivity and stress resistance on the other hand. Previous study showed that, contrarily to anaerobiosis, the resulting gain in ethanol yield was accompanied with no loss of ethanol tolerance under aerobiosis. Moreover those mutants were still able to produce up to 90 gl-1 ethanol in an anaerobic SSF process. Fine tuning metabolic strategy may then open encouraging possibilities for further developing robust strains with improved ethanol yield.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Glycerol, ReagentPlus®, ≥99.0% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Glycerol, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture, suitable for insect cell culture, suitable for electrophoresis, ≥99% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Glycerol, for molecular biology, ≥99.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Glycerol, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Glycerol, BioXtra, ≥99% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Glycerin, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
Glycerol, puriss. p.a., ACS reagent, anhydrous, dist., ≥99.5% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Glycerol, Vetec, reagent grade, 99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Glycerol, ACS reagent, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Glycerol, puriss., anhydrous, 99.0-101.0% (alkalimetric)
Sigma-Aldrich
Glycerol, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Glycerol, tested according to Ph. Eur., anhydrous
Sigma-Aldrich
Glycerol, BioUltra, for molecular biology, anhydrous, ≥99.5% (GC)
Supelco
Glycerin, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material
Sigma-Aldrich
Glycerol solution, 83.5-89.5% (T)
Sigma-Aldrich
Glycerol solution, puriss., meets analytical specification of Ph. Eur., BP, 84-88%