Skip to Content
Merck
  • A predictive ligand-based Bayesian model for human drug-induced liver injury.

A predictive ligand-based Bayesian model for human drug-induced liver injury.

Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals (2010-09-17)
Sean Ekins, Antony J Williams, Jinghai J Xu
ABSTRACT

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is one of the most important reasons for drug development failure at both preapproval and postapproval stages. There has been increased interest in developing predictive in vivo, in vitro, and in silico models to identify compounds that cause idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity. In the current study, we applied machine learning, a Bayesian modeling method with extended connectivity fingerprints and other interpretable descriptors. The model that was developed and internally validated (using a training set of 295 compounds) was then applied to a large test set relative to the training set (237 compounds) for external validation. The resulting concordance of 60%, sensitivity of 56%, and specificity of 67% were comparable to results for internal validation. The Bayesian model with extended connectivity functional class fingerprints of maximum diameter 6 (ECFC_6) and interpretable descriptors suggested several substructures that are chemically reactive and may also be important for DILI-causing compounds, e.g., ketones, diols, and α-methyl styrene type structures. Using Smiles Arbitrary Target Specification (SMARTS) filters published by several pharmaceutical companies, we evaluated whether such reactive substructures could be readily detected by any of the published filters. It was apparent that the most stringent filters used in this study, such as the Abbott alerts, which captures thiol traps and other compounds, may be of use in identifying DILI-causing compounds (sensitivity 67%). A significant outcome of the present study is that we provide predictions for many compounds that cause DILI by using the knowledge we have available from previous studies. These computational models may represent cost-effective selection criteria before in vitro or in vivo experimental studies.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Retinoic acid, ≥98% (HPLC), powder
Sigma-Aldrich
Tetracycline, 98.0-102.0% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Indomethacin, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
L-Ascorbic acid, BioXtra, ≥99.0%, crystalline
Sigma-Aldrich
β-Estradiol, BioReagent, powder, suitable for cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
Trimethoprim, ≥98.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethylene glycol, ReagentPlus®, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Chloroform, ACS spectrophotometric grade, ≥99.8%, contains 0.5-1.0% ethanol as stabilizer
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethylene glycol, spectrophotometric grade, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Chloroform, biotech. grade, ≥99.8%, contains 0.5-1.0% ethanol as stabilizer
Sigma-Aldrich
Chloroform, contains 100-200 ppm amylenes as stabilizer, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Trichloroethylene, puriss. p.a., ≥99.5% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Trichloroethylene, ACS reagent, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Chloroform, suitable for HPLC, ≥99.8%, amylene stabilized
Supelco
Trimethoprim, VETRANAL®, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane, ACS reagent, ≥99.8%
Sigma-Aldrich
Butylated hydroxytoluene, ≥99%, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
L-Ascorbic acid, 99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Theophylline, anhydrous, ≥99%, powder
Sigma-Aldrich
Penicillin G sodium salt, powder, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
Rifampicin, ≥95% (HPLC), powder or crystals
Sigma-Aldrich
Doxorubicin hydrochloride, suitable for fluorescence, 98.0-102.0% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
L-Ascorbic acid, ACS reagent, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
(R)-(+)-Limonene, 97%
Sigma-Aldrich
D-Sorbitol, liquid, tested according to Ph. Eur.
Sigma-Aldrich
D-Sorbitol, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
L-Ascorbic acid, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Chloroform, anhydrous, ≥99%, contains 0.5-1.0% ethanol as stabilizer
Sigma-Aldrich
Erythromycin, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
Prednisone, ≥98%