Skip to Content
Merck
  • A Comparative Study of Phosphatidylcholine versus Phosphatidylserine-Based Solid Supported Membranes for the Preparation of Liposome-Rich Interfaces.

A Comparative Study of Phosphatidylcholine versus Phosphatidylserine-Based Solid Supported Membranes for the Preparation of Liposome-Rich Interfaces.

Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids (2018-09-16)
Alessio Sacconi, Francesco Tadini-Buoninsegni, Bruno Tiribilli, Giancarlo Margheri
ABSTRACT

Solid supported membranes (SSMs) are usually formed by an hybrid octadecanethiol/phosphatidylcholine (PC) bilayer supported by a gold electrode. Recently, it was shown that phosphatidylserine (PS) in place of PC can promote a more effective accumulation of lipid vesicles on the SSM surface when Ca2+ and Mg2+ ions are present in the external environment. Here we performed a detailed comparative study of the vesicle adsorption process onto PC- and PS-SSMs by employing surface plasmon resonance (SPR), electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), and atomic force microscopy (AFM). SPR analysis has demonstrated a higher affinity of the PS-SSM surface for the phospholipid vesicles. Both SPR and EIS measurements suggest that adsorption of lipid vesicles on the PC-SSM tends to a saturating value, whereas a continuous and progressive vesicle adsorption occurs on the PS-SSM surface following subsequent liposome additions. AFM analysis pointed out a systematic flattening of the adsorbed vesicles on the PS-SSM surface. We interpreted our results as due to the strong coordinating action of the high amount of divalent cations accumulated at the negatively charged PS-SSM surface, whereas a lower amount of cations is present on the dipolar PC-SSM surface, which can therefore adsorb only a limited number of vesicles.