Saltar al contenido
Merck

Use of topical liposomes containing meglumine antimoniate (Glucantime) for the treatment of L. major lesion in BALB/c mice.

Experimental parasitology (2014-05-02)
S A Moosavian Kalat, A Khamesipour, N Bavarsad, M Fallah, Z Khashayarmanesh, E Feizi, K Neghabi, A Abbasi, M R Jaafari
RESUMEN

Treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a dream for the patients, health care authorities and scientists. The aim of this study was to develop a topical liposomal meglumine antimoniate (MA, Glucantime™) (Lip-MA) formulation and evaluate the therapeutic effects of the preparation on lesion induced by Leishmania major in BALB/c mice. Liposomes containing 22.5% MA (6.4% Sb(+5)) with and without oleic acid (LMA-OA and LMA) were formulated using fusion method plus homogenization and characterized for the size and encapsulation efficiency. The penetration of MA from the LMA-OA and LMA formulations through and into the skin was checked in vitro using Franz diffusion cells fitted with mouse skin at 37°C for 8h. The in vitro permeation data showed that almost 1.5% of formulations applied in the mouse skin were penetrated and the amount retained in the skin was about 65%. The 50% effective dose of LMA and LMA-OA against amastigotes of L. major was 46.36 and 41.01 μg/ml, respectively. LMA or LMA-OA was used topically twice a day for 4 weeks to treat the lesion induced by L. major in susceptible BALB/c mice. The results showed a significantly (P<0.001) smaller lesion size in the treated groups of mice compared to the control groups which received either empty liposomes or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The spleen parasite burden was significantly (P<0.001) lower in the treated groups compared to the control groups receiving either empty liposomes or PBS at the end of the treatment period. However, when the treatment was stopped, the lesion size progressed and spleen parasite burden increased in LMA and LMA-OA groups, but still was significantly less than the control groups (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two formulations of LMA and LMA-OA. The results suggested that topical liposomes containing MA might be an appropriate choice for clinical trials for the treatment of CL.

MATERIALES
Referencia del producto
Marca
Descripción del producto

Sigma-Aldrich
HEPES, ≥99.5% (titration)
Sigma-Aldrich
HEPES, BioPerformance Certified, ≥99.5% (titration), suitable for cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
Colesterol, Sigma Grade, ≥99%
Supelco
Metil 4-hidroxibenzoato, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material
Sigma-Aldrich
HEPES, BioUltra, for molecular biology, ≥99.5% (T)
Sigma-Aldrich
(±)-α-Tocoferol, synthetic, ≥96% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
1,2-Propanediol, ≥99.5% (GC), FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Colesterol, powder, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
1,2-Propanediol, ACS reagent, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
HEPES buffer solution, 1 M in H2O
Supelco
(±)-α-Tocoferol, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material
Sigma-Aldrich
Propylene Glycol, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
Colesterol, from sheep wool, ≥92.5% (GC), powder
Sigma-Aldrich
(±)-α-Tocoferol, ≥95.5%
Supelco
(±)-α-Tocoferol, analytical standard
SAFC
HEPES
Supelco
1,2-Propanediol, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material
USP
Metilparabeno, United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Reference Standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Metil 4-hidroxibenzoato, ReagentPlus®, ≥99.0%, crystalline
Supelco
Propylparaben, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material