Skip to Content
Merck
  • Aspen defense chemicals influence midgut bacterial community composition of gypsy moth.

Aspen defense chemicals influence midgut bacterial community composition of gypsy moth.

Journal of chemical ecology (2014-12-06)
Charles J Mason, Kennedy F Rubert-Nason, Richard L Lindroth, Kenneth F Raffa
ABSTRACT

Microbial symbionts are becoming increasingly recognized as mediators of many aspects of plant - herbivore interactions. However, the influence of plant chemical defenses on gut associates of insect herbivores is less well understood. We used gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L.), and differing trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) genotypes that vary in chemical defenses, to assess the influence of foliar chemistry on bacterial communities of larval midguts. We evaluated the bacterial community composition of foliage, and of midguts of larvae feeding on those leaves, using next-generation high-throughput sequencing. Plant defense chemicals did not influence the composition of foliar communities. In contrast, both phenolic glycosides and condensed tannins affected the bacterial consortia of gypsy moth midguts. The two most abundant operational taxonomic units were classified as Ralstonia and Acinetobacter. The relative abundance of Ralstonia was higher in midguts than in foliage when phenolic glycoside concentrations were low, but lower in midguts when phenolic glycosides were high. In contrast, the relative abundance of Ralstonia was lower in midguts than in foliage when condensed tannin concentrations were low, but higher in midguts when condensed tannins were high. Acinetobacter showed a different relationship with host chemistry, being relatively more abundant in midguts than with foliage when condensed tannin concentrations were low, but lower in midguts when condensed tannins were high. Acinetobacter tended to have a greater relative abundance in midguts of insects feeding on genotypes with high phenolic glycoside concentrations. These results show that plant defense chemicals influence herbivore midgut communities, which may in turn influence host utilization.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
D-(−)-Salicin, ≥99% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Formic acid solution, BioUltra, 1.0 M in H2O
Supelco
Acetonitrile, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetonitrile, anhydrous, 99.8%
Sigma-Aldrich
Formic acid, ≥95%, FCC, FG
USP
Residual Solvent Class 2 - Acetonitrile, United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Reference Standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetonitrile, HPLC Plus, ≥99.9%, poly-coated bottles
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetonitrile, suitable for HPLC, gradient grade, ≥99.9%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetonitrile, suitable for HPLC-GC, ≥99.8% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetonitrile, HPLC Plus, ≥99.9%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetonitrile, for HPLC, for UV, ≥99.9% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetonitrile, suitable for HPLC, gradient grade, ≥99.9%
Sigma-Aldrich
Ultrapure Acetonitrile
Supelco
Acetonitrile, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material
Supelco
D-(−)-Salicin, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetonitrile, ≥99.5% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetonitrile, ReagentPlus®, 99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Formic acid, ACS reagent, ≥96%
Sigma-Aldrich
Formic acid, puriss., meets analytical specifications of DAC, FCC, 98.0-100%
Sigma-Aldrich
Formic acid, reagent grade, ≥95%
Sigma-Aldrich
Formic acid, puriss. p.a., ACS reagent, reag. Ph. Eur., ≥98%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetonitrile, suitable for DNA synthesis, ≥99.9% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetonitrile, ACS reagent, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetonitrile, biotech. grade, ≥99.93%
Sigma-Aldrich
Formic acid, ACS reagent, ≥88%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetonitrile, electronic grade, 99.999% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Salicylic acid-d6, 98 atom % D, 99% (CP)
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetonitrile solution, contains 0.05 % (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetonitrile solution, contains 0.1 % (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid, suitable for HPLC
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetonitrile solution, contains 10.0% acetone, 0.05% formic acid, 40.0% 2-propanol