Skip to Content
Merck
  • Differences between Solution and Membrane Forms of Chitosan on the In Vitro Activity of Fibroblasts.

Differences between Solution and Membrane Forms of Chitosan on the In Vitro Activity of Fibroblasts.

Balkan medical journal (2015-03-12)
Bahar Uslu, Burcu Biltekin, Seçnur Denir, Suna Özbaş-Turan, Serap Arbak, Jülide Akbuğa, Ayhan Bilir
ABSTRACT

Chitosan, a linear polysaccharide, has been recently used in biomedical applications. In vitro studies have demonstrated its effect on cellular growth and its stimulatory action on cellular layer formation. The present study aims to compare the proliferative effects of chitosan in two forms, membranous and solution forms, on Swiss 3T3 mouse embryonic fibroblasts. In vitro study. Three experimental groups were formed: cells were cultured in a normal medium without chitosan (Control Group); cells were cultured either in a medium containing 2.0% chitosan in membranous form (Membrane Group) or chitosan solution at a concentration of 2.0% (Solution Group). Two different methods were used in the experiments: cells cultured on the medium containing chitosan in solution or membranous forms (method 1); and chitosan solution or membranous forms were added into the medium containing previously cultured cells (method 2). Scanning electron microscopic investigations of the experimental groups revealed cells with well-defined cellular projections, intact cellular membranes and tight intercellular junctions. They were especially prominent in the membrane group of method 1 and in the membrane and solution groups of method 2. Mouse monoclonal anti-collagen 1 primary antibody was used to indicate collagen synthesis. Prominent collagen synthesis was detected in the membrane groups on the 10(th) day of culture for both methods. Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) and MTT assays were performed in order to assess cellular proliferation and viability, respectively. BrdU labelling tests indicated a higher proliferation index in the membrane group of method 1 on the 5(th) and 10(th) days. For the second method, the membranous form on the 10(th) day and solution form on the 5(th) day were the most effective groups in terms of cellular proliferation. MTT results reflected a high cellular viability in method 1 on the 5(th) day of treatment with the membranous form, whereas cellular viability was highest in the solution form of method 2 on the 5(th) day. The membranous form of chitosan induced a significant proliferative effect and increased the ratio of cell-to-cell junctions of Swiss 3T3 mouse embryonic fibroblasts. Conveniently, the solution form also resulted in enhanced cell proliferation and viability compared to the control group. As the solution form is easy to prepare and apply to cells compared to the membrane form, the application of Chitosan directly to media appears to be a convenient alternative for tissue engineering approaches.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Dimethyl sulfoxide, Hybri-Max, sterile-filtered, BioReagent, suitable for hybridoma, ≥99.7%
Sigma-Aldrich
Dimethyl sulfoxide, ≥99.5% (GC), suitable for plant cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
Dimethyl sulfoxide, PCR Reagent
Sigma-Aldrich
Dimethyl sulfoxide, for molecular biology
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethanol, tested according to Ph. Eur.
Sigma-Aldrich
Dimethyl sulfoxide, sterile-filtered, BioPerformance Certified, meets EP, USP testing specifications, suitable for hybridoma
Sigma-Aldrich
Dimethyl sulfoxide, BioUltra, for molecular biology, ≥99.5% (GC)
Supelco
Dimethyl sulfoxide, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Osmium tetroxide solution, suitable for electron microscopy, 4% in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
Osmium tetroxide solution, suitable for electron microscopy, 2% in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
Osmium tetroxide solution, 4 wt. % in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
Dimethyl sulfoxide, ReagentPlus®, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Osmium tetroxide solution, 2.5 wt. % in tert-butanol
Dimethyl sulfoxide, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Dimethyl sulfoxide, suitable for HPLC, ≥99.7%
Sigma-Aldrich
Dimethyl sulfoxide, ACS reagent, ≥99.9%
Supelco
Dimethyl sulfoxide, for inorganic trace analysis, ≥99.99995% (metals basis)
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethanol, BioUltra, for molecular biology, ≥99.8%, (absolute alcohol, without additive, A15 o1)
Supelco
Ethanol, standard for GC
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethanol, for residue analysis
Sigma-Aldrich
Thiazolyl Blue Tetrazolium Bromide, powder, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture, suitable for insect cell culture, ≥97.5% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Thiazolyl Blue Tetrazolium Bromide, 98%
Sigma-Aldrich
Dimethyl sulfoxide, meets EP testing specifications, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethanol, purum, secunda spirit, denaturated with 2% 2-butanone, S15, ~96% (based on denaturant-free substance)
Sigma-Aldrich
8-Octanoyloxypyrene-1,3,6-trisulfonic acid trisodium salt, suitable for fluorescence, ≥90% (HPCE)
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethyl alcohol, Pure, 190 proof, ACS spectrophotometric grade, 95.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethyl alcohol, Pure, 200 proof, anhydrous, ≥99.5%
USP
Dimethyl sulfoxide, United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Reference Standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethanol, purum, fine spirit, denaturated with 2% 2-butanone, F25 MEK1, ~96% (based on denaturant-free substance)
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethanol, purum, absolute ethanol, denaturated with 2% 2-butanone, A15 MEK1, ≥99.8% (based on denaturant-free substance)