Skip to Content
Merck
  • Genetic relatedness versus biological compatibility between Aspergillus fumigatus and related species.

Genetic relatedness versus biological compatibility between Aspergillus fumigatus and related species.

Journal of clinical microbiology (2014-08-08)
Janyce A Sugui, Stephen W Peterson, Abigail Figat, Bryan Hansen, Robert A Samson, Emilia Mellado, Manuel Cuenca-Estrella, Kyung J Kwon-Chung
ABSTRACT

Aspergillus section Fumigati contains 12 clinically relevant species. Among these Aspergillus species, A. fumigatus is the most frequent agent of invasive aspergillosis, followed by A. lentulus and A. viridinutans. Genealogical concordance and mating experiments were performed to examine the relationship between phylogenetic distance and mating success in these three heterothallic species. Analyses of 19 isolates from section Fumigati revealed the presence of three previously unrecognized species within the broadly circumscribed species A. viridinutans. A single mating type was found in the new species Aspergillus pseudofelis and Aspergillus pseudoviridinutans, but in Aspergillus parafelis, both mating types were present. Reciprocal interspecific pairings of all species in the study showed that the only successful crosses occurred with the MAT1-2 isolates of both A. parafelis and A. pseudofelis. The MAT1-2 isolate of A. parafelis was fertile when paired with the MAT1-1 isolates of A. fumigatus, A. viridinutans, A. felis, A. pseudoviridinutans, and A. wyomingensis but was not fertile with the MAT1-1 isolate of A. lentulus. The MAT1-2 isolates of A. pseudofelis were fertile when paired with the MAT1-1 isolate of A. felis but not with any of the other species. The general infertility in the interspecies crossings suggests that genetically unrelated species are also biologically incompatible, with the MAT1-2 isolates of A. parafelis and A. pseudofelis being the exception. Our findings underscore the importance of genealogical concordance analysis for species circumscription, as well as for accurate species identification, since misidentification of morphologically similar pathogens with differences in innate drug resistance may be of grave consequences for disease management.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Glutaraldehyde solution, 50 wt. % in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
Glutaraldehyde solution, technical, ~50% in H2O (5.6 M)
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrocortisone 21-acetate, ≥98% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrocortisone 21-acetate, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
Glutaraldehyde solution, 50% in H2O, suitable for photographic applications
Sigma-Aldrich
Glutaraldehyde solution, Grade I, 8% in H2O, specially purified for use as an electron microscopy fixative or other sophisticated use
Sigma-Aldrich
Glutaraldehyde solution, Grade I, 70% in H2O, specially purified for use as an electron microscopy fixative or other sophisticated use
Sigma-Aldrich
Glutaraldehyde solution, Grade I, 25% in H2O, specially purified for use as an electron microscopy fixative
Sigma-Aldrich
Glutaraldehyde solution, Grade I, 50% in H2O, specially purified for use as an electron microscopy fixative or other sophisticated use
Sigma-Aldrich
Glutaraldehyde solution, Grade II, 25% in H2O
Itraconazole, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
Voriconazole, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
Supelco
Voriconazole, VETRANAL®, analytical standard
Hydrocortisone acetate, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
USP
Hydrocortisone acetate, United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Reference Standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Glutaric dialdehyde solution, 50 wt. % in H2O, FCC
Amphotericin B, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
Hydrocortisone acetate for peak identification, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Itraconazole, ≥98% (HPLC)