Saltar al contenido
Merck
HomeMetabolomics ResearchStable Isotope Labeled Fatty Acids as Metabolic Tracers

Stable Isotope Labeled Fatty Acids as Metabolic Tracers

Jennifer E. Lambert, Parks Group1, Elizabeth J. Parks, Associate Professor1,2

1The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 2Departments of Clinical Nutrition and Internal Medicine

Postprandial Metabolism and Disease Risk

Traditionally, cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors have been determined and measured in the fasting state. However in recent years there has been an increasing awareness of the importance of elevated postprandial lipemia as an independent risk for CVD.1 Indeed, the efficiency with which the body manages incoming dietary macronutrients such as lipid can modulate disease risk in chronic conditions such as obesity2, type 2 diabetes,3,4 and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.5 Interest in the postprandial state has led to the development of products and technologies designed to quantitate the kinetics of dietary fat (triacylglycerols, TG) absorption, assimilation, and disposal. Development of isotope methodology has expanded the investigation of human lipid metabolism by allowing for a multitude of applications for measurement of in vivo lipid kinetics. Although radioactive isotopes have been used to elucidate seminal findings in the area of fat metabolism,6 the present review will focus on the use of stablely-labeled compounds in human dietary research.

Applications of Stablely Labeled Dietary Tracers

The most obvious use of dietary lipid tracers is for investigation of lipid absorption after a test meal. The labeled fat can be observed as lipids, fatty acids (FA) and TG, in plasma, chylomicrons (CM), and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) particles. Dietary TG absorption reaches its maximum between 3-4 hours after the meal (Figure 1). In studies of normal physiology, isotopically-labeled dietary FA can be used to determine if absorption depends on fat quality, such as structure of the FA7,8 or TG,9 and how absorbed FA are partitioned into lipid fractions other than TG.10,11 Alternatively, tracers can be used to determine if absorption is affected by diseases or stage of life. Such applications have been used in studies of obesity,12,13 diabetes,4 malnourishment,14 and aging.15 In addition, because stable isotopes (and stable isotopically-labeled compounds) are naturally-occurring, these compounds are safe for use in many populations, including infants,16 children,14 pregnant or lactating women,7 and the elderly.15

The use of dietary tracers lends itself to a wide variety of analytical applications beyond the measurement of absorption. Labeled precursors, such as the essential FA linoleic and linolenic acid, have allowed the determination of FA elongation and desaturation into longer-chain products.17,18 Combining tracer technologies with other compartment analyses can further expand the analytical possibilities of dietary tracers. For example, tissue biopsies are used to assess tissue uptake of dietary fat into muscle, adipose, or liver.2,19,20 Lipid oxidation can be determined by measuring 13CO2 in breath or D2O in urine.8,21-23 Therefore, with the many applications possible, investigators can create and define new avenues of exploration in postprandial lipid metabolism.24

Fraction lipoprotein-TG derived from the meal

Figure 1. Healthy males (n=6, mean ± SEM) consumed two meals (0700 and 1200) of identical composition (32% fat, 54% carbohydrate, 14% protein), with each meal representing 1/3 of daily energy needs. D31-tripalmitin (1.6g) was mixed with the liquid formula containing 40 g of dietary fat/meal as described previously.26, 30 Lipoprotein TG-palmitate was analyzed by GC/MS. The d31-palmitate percentages (tracer/tracee) in the two lipoprotein fractions were compared to the TG enrichment in the liquid meal to calculate the percentage of lipoprotein-TG derived from the meal (Parks & Timlin unpublished data).

Practical Aspects and Study Design Considerations

Tracer Considerations

Common measurement techniques for analysis of metabolized labeled compounds are gas chromatography coupled with either mass spectrometry (MS) or isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS). Choice of analytical technique will depend on availability, cost, and sensitivity required for the experiment, and will influence the dose of tracer to be used. For example, the higher sensitivity of IRMS allows for detection at lower levels of tracer enrichment; therefore smaller doses of tracer can be administered.

Tracer Form

As shown in Table 1, the choices of dietary tracers can include FA fed in the free form (e.g. Na+-palmitate) or as a TG (glyceryl trihexadecanoate-D31, or tripalmitin-D31). The degree of isotope labeling will depend on the desired application, and cost, as some compounds are time-consuming to synthesize. Tracers can be combined using different delivery methods in order to investigate multiple pathways of lipid metabolism. Using the multiple stable isotope approach, Donnelly et al. utilized IV infusion of K+-13C4-palmitate on albumin to measure non-esterified FA metabolism, and a meal containing D31-tripalmitin to concurrently measure dietary FA metabolism to determine the lipid contributors to VLDL-TG.5 If multiple tracers are to be used, either different isotopic atoms should be chosen for each compound (e.g. Donnelly (2005) used a carbon-labeled FA and a deuterium-labeled TG) or it must be ensured that each tracer differs by enough mass to enable accurate and separate measurement of the products of interest. For example, in order to investigate effects of sham feeding and multiple meals, Chavez-Jaurequi et al. incorporated 13C2-triolein into the evening meal and 13C7-triolein into the breakfast meal.13 Alternatively, different FA containing the same isotopic label (e.g. 13C-oleate and 13C-palmitate) can be used;25 however there is some debate as to whether this approach is appropriate, because differences in absorption8,11 or oxidation8,23 between different FA could influence results and interpretation.

Tracer Dose and Delivery

Dose of the tracer will depend on level of enrichment desired, metabolite of interest, and dietary fat content (Table 1A). The tracer-to-tracee enrichment, or rather the comparison of amount of tracer FA fed to the amount of unlabeled dietary FA fed, can be as high as 10-20%.5,26 We have chosen a high level of enrichment in meals to be able to assess the early absorption of the label. The ratio of the tracer (e.g. 100-800 mg) to the amount of total dietary fat (35-40 g) may be much lower (<3%) depending how much dietary fat is fed.25,27 The greater the amount fed in the meal, the more accurate assessment at earlier postprandial timepoints.

Capsules have been used previously to deliver tracer lipids,8,13 but it has been reported that the recovery of 13C in breath is 10 times higher when the tracer is fed in the meal compared to capsule form.23 This presents a problem for incorporation into a food if the tracer is a FA bound to a salt such as sodium or potassium; this is because the FA salt has physical properties as a soap. Therefore, if the FA salt is solubilized in water, it must be handled gently or it will create foam and result in a food product more difficult to ingest as well as absorb.28 The incorporation of labeled FA into food (Table 1B) for administration has typically been achieved by emulsifying the FA into a sugar-protein complex, vegetable oil, or butter, and placed into food or a “milkshake” type beverage for consumption.10,11,29 The vehicle for the tracer often must be heated or sonicated in order to efficiently incorporate the tracer. Barrows et al. used a homogenizer readily available in food processing labs (Model 110Y microfluidizer, Microfluidics, Newton, MA).30 Triglyceride tracers are more easily incorporated into test vehicles if the tracer is an oil (such as triolein), whereas tripalmitin is a crystal which must be heated for complete solubilization.

Methodological Considerations

Rate of Delivery and Meal Consumption

Early fat tolerance tests performed without isotopes were designed to provide a dose that would challenge the body’s lipid handling systems.31 Later, postprandial studies were designed to better mimic normal patterns of eating by including carbohydrate and protein with the fat,32,33 and feeding solid foods with the addition of isotopes to meals. Investigators have used both liquid26 and solid5,22 meals (Table 1B). Liquid meals have been provided as either continuous feedings via periodically sipping a beverage34 or by duodenal administration30 (Table 1B). However, feeding the meal as a typical bolus is preferred because it produces greater label incorporation and greater fat oxidation8 compared to continuous feeding.30 The exception is studies in hospitalized infants, where set meal times are not practical.35 The choice of the amount of dietary fat fed in the test meal will depend on the increase in postprandial plasma lipids desired. Increasing the amount of dietary fat leads to higher postprandial plasma TG concentrations,36 which dilutes the appearance of the label but can also amplify plasma lipid concentrations to a level sufficient for effective analysis.

Multiple Meals

Many investigators have used only one meal containing the tracer to measure postprandial metabolism. However, a delay in absorption has been demonstrated in the appearance of dietary tracer in the CM and VLDL TG pools13,25,26,37 (Figure 1). The delay can occur from 4h to 13h after the first labeled meal. This so-called “Second Meal Effect” is required to see maximum appearance of the dietary tracer in plasma lipid compartments,13,25 such that the consumption of a subsequent labeled meal is associated with more label appearance in blood (Figure 1). After two meals, 100% of the CM-TG pool contains the same enrichment as the meal, leading to all of the TG in CM particles being derived from the tracer-containing meal. This second meal does not need to contain fat, as a simple glucose drink has been shown to induce a CM lipid response.38 The Second Meal Effect also indicates that the food consumed the evening before the test influences postprandial metabolism.39 The pre-test meal composition should therefore be controlled by providing standardized meals at least the evening before, if not for 1-3 days leading up to the testing day.30 If using a 13C-labeled tracer, some investigators also instruct subjects to avoid foods naturally rich in 13C, such as corn products and cane sugar.4 Other lifestyle aspects to take into consideration include asking participants to avoid strenuous exercise and alcohol 2-3 days before the testing period.4,30

Table 1. Study design considerations.

Future Directions

With the growing interest in postprandial metabolism and wide variety of applications, stable isotopes are an invaluable tool for investigating human metabolism. A large body of literature utilizing isotopes to measure the absorption and disposal of dietary fat exists. Standardized protocols have been published to aid researchers interested in studying the impact of dietary fat using stable isotopes. Given the role of fat intake on the development of obesity and its related disorders, stable isotope and mass spectrometry methods can provide powerful tools for further characterization of normal and dysregulated physiological processes. Such investigations will help to unravel how postprandial metabolism contributes to disease pathology and create novel clinical tools for screening and treatment. Examination of postprandial lipid metabolism in obesity may pave the way for development of pharmaceutical or nutritional interventions for beneficial modification of postprandial lipemia to reduce disease risk.

Materials List
Loading

References

1.
Bansal S, Buring JE, Rifai N, Mora S, Sacks FM, Ridker PM. 2007. Fasting Compared With Nonfasting Triglycerides and Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Women. JAMA. 298(3):309. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.3.309
2.
McQuaid SE, Hodson L, Neville MJ, Dennis AL, Cheeseman J, Humphreys SM, Ruge T, Gilbert M, Fielding BA, Frayn KN, et al. 2011. Downregulation of Adipose Tissue Fatty Acid Trafficking in Obesity. Diabetes. 60(1):47-55. https://doi.org/10.2337/db10-0867
3.
Hodson L, Bickerton AS, McQuaid SE, Roberts R, Karpe F, Frayn KN, Fielding BA. 2007. The Contribution of Splanchnic Fat to VLDL Triglyceride Is Greater in Insulin-Resistant Than Insulin-Sensitive Men and Women: Studies in the Postprandial State. Diabetes. 56(10):2433-2441. https://doi.org/10.2337/db07-0654
4.
Masding MG, Stears AJ, Burdge GC, Wootton SA, Sandeman DD. 2006. The benefits of oestrogens on postprandial lipid metabolism are lost in post-menopausal women with Type 2 diabetes. Diabetic Med. 23(7):768-774. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01867.x
5.
Donnelly KL, Smith CI, Schwarzenberg SJ, Jessurun J, Boldt MD, Parks EJ. 2005. Sources of fatty acids stored in liver and secreted via lipoproteins in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Clin. Invest.. 115(5):1343-1351. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci23621
6.
Santosa S, Hensrud DD, Votruba SB, Jensen MD. 2008. The influence of sex and obesity phenotype on meal fatty acid metabolism before and after weight loss. 88(4):1134-1141. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/88.4.1134
7.
1989. Incorporation of deuterium-labeled fatty acids into human milk, plasma, and lipoprotein phospholipids and cholesteryl esters.. [Internet]. Peoria, IL: The Journal of Lipid Research. Available from: https://www.jlr.org/content/30/3/395.short
8.
Jones PJH, Pencharz PB, Clandinin MT. 1985. Whole body oxidation of dietary fatty acids: implications for energy utilization. 42(5):769-777. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/42.5.769
9.
Emken EA, Adlof RO, Duval SM, Shane JM, Walker PM, Becker C. 2004. Effect of triacylglycerol structure on absorption and metabolism of isotope-labeled palmitic and linoleic acids by humans. Lipids. 39(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11745-004-1194-6
10.
Emken EA. 1994. Metabolism of dietary stearic acid relative to other fatty acids in human subjects. 60(6):1023S-1028S. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/60.6.1023s
11.
Hodson L, McQuaid SE, Karpe F, Frayn KN, Fielding BA. 2009. Differences in partitioning of meal fatty acids into blood lipid fractions: a comparison of linoleate, oleate, and palmitate. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism. 296(1):E64-E71. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.90730.2008
12.
Hodson L, McQuaid SE, Humphreys SM, Milne R, Fielding BA, Frayn KN, Karpe F. 2010. Greater dietary fat oxidation in obese compared with lean men: an adaptive mechanism to prevent liver fat accumulation?. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism. 299(4):E584-E592. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00272.2010
13.
Chavez?Jauregui RN, Mattes RD, Parks EJ. 2010. Dynamics of Fat Absorption and Effect of Sham Feeding on Postprandial Lipema. Gastroenterology. 139(5):1538-1548. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2010.05.002
14.
2001. Gastrointestinal handling and metabolic disposal of 13C-labelled tripalmitin during rehabilitation from childhood malnutrition. [Internet]. Southampton SO16 6YD, UK: National Library of Medicine. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11430775/
15.
Puga GM, Meyer C, Everman S, Mandarino LJ, Katsanos CS. 2011. Postprandial lipemia in the elderly involves increased incorporation of ingested fat in plasma free fatty acids and small (Sf 20?400) triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism. 301(2):E356-E361. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00670.2010
16.
Lin YH, Llanos A, Mena P, Uauy R, Salem N, Pawlosky RJ. 2010. Compartmental analyses of 2H5-?-linolenic acid and C-U-eicosapentaenoic acid toward synthesis of plasma labeled 22:6n?3 in newborn term infants. 92(2):284-293. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2009.28779
17.
Emken EA, Adlof RO, Duval SM, Nelson GJ. 1997. Influence of dietary arachidonic acid on metabolism in vivo of 8 cis, 11 cis, 14-eicosatrienoic acid in humans. Lipids. 32(4):441-448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11745-997-0058-4
18.
Pawlosky RJ, Hibbeln JR, Lin Y, Goodson S, Riggs P, Sebring N, Brown GL, Salem N. 2003. Effects of beef- and fish-based diets on the kinetics of n?3 fatty acid metabolism in human subjects. 77(3):565-572. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/77.3.565
19.
Bickerton AS, Roberts R, Fielding BA, Hodson L, Blaak EE, Wagenmakers AJ, Gilbert M, Karpe F, Frayn KN. 2007. Preferential Uptake of Dietary Fatty Acids in Adipose Tissue and Muscle in the Postprandial Period. Diabetes. 56(1):168-176. https://doi.org/10.2337/db06-0822
20.
Evans K, Burdge GC, Wootton SA, Clark ML, Frayn KN. 2002. Regulation of Dietary Fatty Acid Entrapment in Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue and Skeletal Muscle. Diabetes. 51(9):2684-2690. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.51.9.2684
21.
Roberts R, Bickerton AS, Fielding BA, Blaak EE, Wagenmakers AJ, Chong MF, Gilbert M, Karpe F, Frayn KN. 2008. Reduced oxidation of dietary fat after a short term high-carbohydrate diet. 87(4):824-831. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/87.4.824
22.
Jones AE, Stolinski M, Smith RD, Murphy JL, Wootton SA. 1999. Effect of fatty acid chain length and saturation on the gastrointestinal handling and metabolic disposal of dietary fatty acids in women. Br J Nutr. 81(1):37-44. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007114599000124
23.
DeLany JP, Windhauser MM, Champagne CM, Bray GA. 2000. Differential oxidation of individual dietary fatty acids in humans. 72(4):905-911. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/72.4.905
24.
Parks EJ, Hellerstein MK. 2000. Carbohydrate-induced hypertriacylglycerolemia: historical perspective and review of biological mechanisms. 71(2):412-433. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/71.2.412
25.
Heath RB, Karpe F, Milne RW, Burdge GC, Wootton SA, Frayn KN. 2007. Dietary fatty acids make a rapid and substantial contribution to VLDL-triacylglycerol in the fed state. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism. 292(3):E732-E739. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00409.2006
26.
Timlin MT, Barrows BR, Parks EJ. 2005. Increased Dietary Substrate Delivery Alters Hepatic Fatty Acid Recycling in Healthy Men. Diabetes. 54(9):2694-2701. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.54.9.2694
27.
Evans K, Burdge GC, Wootton SA, Collins JM, Clark ML, Tan GD, Karpe F, Frayn KN. 2008. Tissue-specific stable isotope measurements of postprandial lipid metabolism in familial combined hyperlipidaemia. Atherosclerosis. 197(1):164-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.03.009
28.
1999. Effect of fatty acid chain length and saturation on the gastrointestinal handling and metabolic disposal of dietary fatty acids in women. [Internet]. The British Journal of Nutrition. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10341674/
29.
Murphy JL, Jones A, Brookes S, Wootton SA. 1995. The gastrointestinal handling and metabolism of [1-13C]palmitic acid in healthy women. Lipids. 30(4):291-298. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02536035
30.
Barrows BR, Timlin MT, Parks EJ. 2005. Spillover of Dietary Fatty Acids and Use of Serum Nonesterified Fatty Acids for the Synthesis of VLDL-Triacylglycerol Under Two Different Feeding Regimens. Diabetes. 54(9):2668-2673. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.54.9.2668
31.
Ginsberg HN, Jones J, Blaner WS, Thomas A, Karmally W, Fields L, Blood D, Begg MD. 1995. Association of Postprandial Triglyceride and Retinyl Palmitate Responses With Newly Diagnosed Exercise-Induced Myocardial Ischemia in Middle-Aged Men and Women. ATVB. 15(11):1829-1838. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.atv.15.11.1829
32.
Redard CL, Davis PA, Schneeman BO. 1990. Dietary fiber and gender: effect on postprandial lipemia. 52(5):837-845. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/52.5.837
33.
Schneeman BO, Kotite L, Todd KM, Havel RJ. 1993. Relationships between the responses of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins in blood plasma containing apolipoproteins B-48 and B-100 to a fat-containing meal in normolipidemic humans.. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 90(5):2069-2073. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.5.2069
34.
Zheng C, Ikewaki K, Walsh BW, Sacks FM. 2006. Metabolism of apoB lipoproteins of intestinal and hepatic origin during constant feeding of small amounts of fat. J. Lipid Res.. 47(8):1771-1779. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.m500528-jlr200
35.
Sunehag AL, Haymond MW, Schanler RJ, Reeds PJ, Bier DM. 1999. Gluconeogenesis in very low birth weight infants receiving total parenteral nutrition. Diabetes. 48(4):791-800. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.48.4.791
36.
Dubois C, Beaumier G, Juhel C, Armand M, Portugal H, Pauli AM, Borel P, Latgé C, Lairon D. 1998. Effects of graded amounts (0?50 g) of dietary fat on postprandial lipemia and lipoproteins in normolipidemic adults. 67(1):31-38. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/67.1.31
37.
Evans K, Kuusela PJ, Cruz ML, Wilhelmova I, Fielding BA, Frayn KN. 1998. Rapid chylomicron appearance following sequential meals: effects of second meal composition. Br J Nutr. 79(5):425-429. https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn19980072
38.
Robertson MD. 2003. Mobilisation of enterocyte fat stores by oral glucose in humans. 52(6):834-839. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.52.6.834
39.
Robertson MD, Henderson RA, Vist GE, Rumsey RDE. 2002. Extended effects of evening meal carbohydrate-to-fat ratio on fasting and postprandial substrate metabolism. 75(3):505-510. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/75.3.505
Inicie sesión para continuar.

Para seguir leyendo, inicie sesión o cree una cuenta.

¿No tiene una cuenta?