Skip to Content
Merck
All Photos(1)

Documents

33996

Supelco

Ethopabate

VETRANAL®, analytical standard

Synonym(s):

Methyl 4-acetamido-2-ethoxybenzoate, Ethopabate, Ethyl pabate

Sign Into View Organizational & Contract Pricing
All Photos(1)

About This Item

Empirical Formula (Hill Notation):
C12H15NO4
CAS Number:
59-06-3
Molecular Weight:
237.25
Beilstein:
2808914
EC Number:
200-414-3
MDL number:
MFCD00075809
UNSPSC Code:
41116107
PubChem Substance ID:
329754735
NACRES:
NA.24

grade

analytical standard

Quality Level

100

product line

VETRANAL®

shelf life

limited shelf life, expiry date on the label

technique(s)

HPLC: suitable
gas chromatography (GC): suitable

application(s)

forensics and toxicology
pharmaceutical (small molecule)

format

neat

SMILES string

CCOc1cc(NC(C)=O)ccc1C(=O)OC

InChI

1S/C12H15NO4/c1-4-17-11-7-9(13-8(2)14)5-6-10(11)12(15)16-3/h5-7H,4H2,1-3H3,(H,13,14)

InChI key

GOVWOKSKFSBNGD-UHFFFAOYSA-N

Looking for similar products? Visit Product Comparison Guide

General description

Ethopabate is an antibiotic used as a coccidiostat in poultry feeds.

Application

Ethopabate may be used as a reference standard in the determination of ethopabate in feed samples using solid phase extraction with high performance liquid chromatography (SPE-HPLC).
Refer to the product′s Certificate of Analysis for more information on a suitable instrument technique. Contact Technical Service for further support.

Recommended products

Find a digital Reference Material for this product available on our online platform ChemisTwin® for NMR. You can use this digital equivalent on ChemisTwin® for your sample identity confirmation and compound quantification (with digital external standard). An NMR spectrum of this substance can be viewed and an online comparison against your sample can be performed with a few mouseclicks. Learn more here and start your free trial.

Legal Information

VETRANAL is a registered trademark of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

Pictograms

Exclamation mark
GHS07

Signal Word

Warning

Hazard Statements

H302,H319

Hazard Classifications

Acute Tox. 4 Oral - Eye Irrit. 2

Storage Class Code

11 - Combustible Solids

WGK

WGK 3

Personal Protective Equipment

dust mask type N95 (US), Eyeshields, Gloves

Choose from one of the most recent versions:

Certificates of Analysis (COA)

Lot/Batch Number
BCCH6715
BCBW4596
SZBA166XV
SZBA166X
SZE8266X

Don't see the Right Version?

If you require a particular version, you can look up a specific certificate by the Lot or Batch number.

Search for a COA

Already Own This Product?

Find documentation for the products that you have recently purchased in the Document Library.

Visit the Document Library

A C Voeten et al.
Tijdschrift voor diergeneeskunde, 103(23), 1284-1289 (1978-12-01)
A floor pen trial was carried out on broilers in 1975 to compare the anticoccidial efficacy of monensin1), 3,5 dinitro-o-toluamide2), clopidol3), amprolium + ethopabacte4), amprolium + ethopabate + sulfaquinoxaline + pyrimethamine5) and robenidine6) in the presence of untreated controls. 4,200
Rapid quantitation of ethopabate in chicken muscles using high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorimetric detection: purification from extractant by continuous liquid-liquid partition.
T Nagata et al.
Journal of chromatography, 281, 367-370 (1983-12-23)
R L Smallidge
Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 61(3), 561-563 (1978-05-01)
A gas-liquid chromatographic method is presented for determining ethopabate in 0.8 and 8.0% premixes. A sample is extracted with tetrahydrofuran containing an internal standard, by sonication or overnight soaking. The extract is clarified by centrifugation, diluted if necessary, and injected
Determination of pyrimethamine, ethopabate and sulphaquinoxaline in poultry feeding stuffs by high-performance liquid chromatography using a weak cation-exchange column packing.
G B Cox et al.
The Analyst, 102(1210), 29-34 (1977-01-01)
C Riddell et al.
Avian diseases, 36(3), 491-498 (1992-07-01)
Male broiler chickens were raised to 63 days of age under different lighting and anticoccidial treatments. A constant-light program was compared with two interrupted and increasing-light programs in which the photoperiod length was 6 hours between 7 and 14 days
View All Related Papers

Our team of scientists has experience in all areas of research including Life Science, Material Science, Chemical Synthesis, Chromatography, Analytical and many others.

Contact Technical Service