Skip to Content
Merck
  • Effect of dietary protein level and rumen-protected amino acid supplementation on amino acid utilization for milk protein in lactating dairy cows.

Effect of dietary protein level and rumen-protected amino acid supplementation on amino acid utilization for milk protein in lactating dairy cows.

Journal of dairy science (2014-12-31)
C Lee, F Giallongo, A N Hristov, H Lapierre, T W Cassidy, K S Heyler, G A Varga, C Parys
ABSTRACT

This study investigated the effect of metabolizable protein (MP) supply and rumen-protected (RP) Lys and Met supplementation on productivity, nutrient digestibility, urinary N losses, apparent total-tract digestibility of dietary AA, and the efficiency of AA utilization for milk protein synthesis in dairy cows. The experiment was conducted with 8 ruminally cannulated Holstein cows in a replicated 4×4 Latin square design trial with 21-d periods. Treatments were (1) MP-adequate diet (AMP; MP balance of -24 g/d); (2) MP-deficient diet (DMP; MP balance of -281 g/d); (3) DMP supplemented with 100 g of RPLys/cow per day (estimated digestible Lys supply=24 g/d; DMPL; MP balance of -305g/d); and (4) DMPL supplemented with 24 g of RPMet/cow per day (estimated digestible Met supply=15 g/d; DMPLM; MP balance of -256g/d). Diet had no effect on total-tract nutrient digestibility, milk production, and milk composition, but the DMP diets decreased urinary N excretion and the ammonia emitting potential of manure. Plasma Met concentration was increased by DMPLM compared with AMP. Supplementation with RPLys had no effect on plasma Lys. Concentration of most AA in milk protein was increased or tended to be increased by DMPLM compared with DMPL. Except for the AA supplemented as RPAA (i.e., Met and Lys), apparent total-tract digestibility of all dietary AA was generally greater for the DMP diets and ranged from 33% (Arg, AMP diet) to 67% (Thr, DMPL diet). Apparent recovery of dietary AA in milk protein followed the same trends, being greater for the DMP diets than AMP and generally lower for Lys and Met with the RPAA-supplemented diets versus AMP and DMP. The RPAA were apparently not used for milk protein synthesis in the conditions of this experiment. The AA recoveries in milk protein varied from around 17% (Ala) to 70% (Pro). Milk protein recoveries of essential AA (EAA) were around 54% for the DMP diet and 49% for AMP. The estimated efficiency of utilization of digestible EAA for milk protein synthesis was generally greater for the DMP diets compared with AMP. In this trial, blood plasma Lys and Met were labeled by abomasal pulse-dose of 15N-Lys and 13C-Met (respectively). Analysis of the 15N-Lys and 13C-Met decay curves in plasma indicated trends for a faster extraction of Lys and Met from plasma for the MP-deficient diets, compared with AMP. Overall, this study confirmed conclusions from previous analyses that the efficiency of utilization of dietary EAA will increase with decreasing MP-AA supply.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Urea-12C, 99.9 atom % 12C
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea solution, BioUltra, ~8 M in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea solution, 40 % (w/v) in H2O
Millipore
Urea solution, suitable for microbiology, 40% in H2O
Supelco
Urea, 8 M (after reconstitution with 16 mL high purity water)
Urea, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
Atovaquone, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
Supelco
Urea, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, suitable for electrophoresis
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, ACS reagent, 99.0-100.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, powder, BioReagent, for molecular biology, suitable for cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, BioXtra, pH 7.5-9.5 (20 °C, 5 M in H2O)
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, ReagentPlus®, ≥99.5%, pellets
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, BioUltra, for molecular biology, 99% (T)
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, puriss. p.a., ACS reagent, reag. Ph. Eur., ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, puriss., meets analytical specification of Ph. Eur., BP, USP, 99.0-100.5%, 99.0-101.0% (calc. on dry substance)