Skip to Content
Merck
  • Cost-effectiveness of oral triptans for acute migraine: mixed treatment comparison.

Cost-effectiveness of oral triptans for acute migraine: mixed treatment comparison.

International journal of technology assessment in health care (2012-09-28)
Christian Asseburg, Piia Peura, Tuija Oksanen, Juha Turunen, Timo Purmonen, Janne Martikainen
ABSTRACT

The cost-effectiveness of triptans in the treatment of migraine has not been assessed since generic sumatriptan entered the Finnish market in 2008. Using systematic review and mixed treatment comparison, the effectiveness of triptans was estimated with regard to 2-hour response, 2-hour pain-free, recurrence, and any adverse event, using published clinical data. Direct and indirect costs (2010 EUR, societal perspective) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were evaluated over one acute migraine attack using a decision-tree model. The meta-analysis combined data from fifty-six publications. The highest probability of achieving the primary outcome, "sustained pain-free, no adverse event" (SNAE), was estimated for eletriptan 40 mg (20.9 percent). Sumatriptan 100 mg was the treatment with lowest estimated costs (€20.86), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of eletriptan 40 mg compared with sumatriptan 100 mg was €43.65 per SNAE gained (€19,659 per QALY gained). Depending on the decision-maker's willingness-to-pay threshold, either sumatriptan 100 mg or eletriptan 40 mg is likely to be cost-effective.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sumatriptan for system suitability, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Sumatriptan succinate, ≥98% (HPLC), solid